Subject:
|
Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:18:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
19281 times
|
| |
|
|
Eric Kingsley wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Dave Sterling wrote:
> > Does anyone have any thoughts on this? I know it probably won't be an issue
> > right away since most people will probably stick with mainly 9V for the time
> > being. But at some point...it will be an issue.
> >
> > -Dave
>
> I agree that IR is not ideal for all the reasons previously listed. I hope WiFi
> is a consideration for a later release. Line of site controlers just are not
> practical for large layouts but I would guess we will find a way to manage. The
> limited frequencies/channels are also a concern.
>
> I am sure we will find a way to adjust even if it causes pain initially.
Even if it's a different firmware version of the IR link that does not
have a timeout feature - that would be an intersting stop-gap.
Ralph
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains
|
| (...) I agree that IR is not ideal for all the reasons previously listed. I hope WiFi is a consideration for a later release. Line of site controlers just are not practical for large layouts but I would guess we will find a way to manage. The (...) (19 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
