Subject:
|
Re: what is the use of a caboose?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:00:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
968 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Frank Filz writes:
>
>
> And trolley buses still operate in Boston (I'm curious, is there any
> city which has a greater variety of mass transit systems? About the only
> thing Boston doesn't have is a monorail.
Sydney has (in rough order of actual usefulness):
conventional bus,
heavy rail (suburban and interurban trains),
ferries (various conventional and catamarans),
light rail (trams recently re-established on the outskirts of the CBD),
and a monorail. The latter two are pretty much for tourists and advertising.
What are we missing out on?
--DaveL
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: what is the use of a caboose?
|
| (...) Ok, let's see if I can list all the types Boston has (I am including some types Sydney certainly has): subway light rail (both above and underground) (subway and light rail above ground run both on dedicated right of way and in the median) (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: what is the use of a caboose?
|
| (...) I suspect the guards van doesn't have the same romaticism as the caboose because it wasn't so much a living quarters. Trains are also heavily romanticized in the US because of their role in developing the nation (we wouldn't be arguing about (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
