Subject:
|
Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 07:13:02 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
ssgore@superonline&AntiSpam&.com
|
Viewed:
|
788 times
|
| |
|
|
Mark Sandlin wrote:
>
> In lugnet.starwars, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
>
> > Well, Mark, Idon't what else to say except you might want to get your
> > eyesight checked, because I see the Outrider, not a "blob which vaguely
> > resembled the Outrider." It was not in the originals, and they put it in
> > there for a little plug for Shadows of the Empire. You seem very upset • about
> > this for some unknown reason. If you feel so entrenched in terms of • what it
> > is or is not, fine.
> >
> > Scott S.
>
> I'm not upset. You're the one throwing the insults. (eyesight)
>
> I am simply skeptical until I see clear proof. I frame-by-framed Ep. 1 on
> my VCR at home, and the ship that everyone says is the Outrider is just
> too blurry to make sense of.
>
> Don't let my opinion get you so pressured up. It's just my opinion.
>
> ~Mark
You are fighting for nothing guys..:-) The Outrider is there (not in
Ep.1, by the way, in special edition of Ep.4, I think it's just a typo
but, just for the other case) whether it is clear or not. The "Behind
The Magic" CD from the Lucas Arts it self, so a quite official source,
says it is there, period.
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
31 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
