Subject:
|
Re: Upcoming _Star Wars Releases
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Oct 1999 17:59:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
747 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Ryan Dennett writes:
> Personally I don't buy any of what you just said. There will be a Slave I
> either this year or next year, and it will be called 'SLAVE I'
> TLG has a contract w/Lucas and they abide by his decisions and
> he'd never allow them to call Slave I a crappy name like Bounty Hunter
> Ship.
Ever heard of "Darth Vader's Star Destroyer Playset"? Kenner didn't want to
call the playset for the ship "The Executor".
I don't know that they wouldn't call it Slave I, mind you, just that it is
possible for them to change the name if they think it would sell better. After
all, what's worse- calling the ship Slave I, or putting the little captive Han
in it?
eric
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Upcoming _Star Wars Releases
|
| (...) They could call it "Boba Fett's Firespray", or just "Firespray". That is the class of ship it is afterall. Jeff "Girls really seem to like a guy in spandex." (25 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: Upcoming _Star Wars Releases
|
| (...) I doubt they'd go with "Bounty Hunter Ship" though - too generic. If they change the name, it'll probably be to something like "Boba Fett's Starship" or something else with the magic name "Boba Fett" in it... J (25 years ago, 15-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Upcoming _Star Wars Releases
|
| (...) think (...) simple (...) Star (...) know (...) hopeful (...) means (...) feeling is (...) of Han (...) Yep, that's the only option. Those two minifigs come with a Slave I and Han will actually fit in the carbonite(kinda like the Adventurer's (...) (25 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
