To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 2847
2846  |  2848
Subject: 
Re: to Minifig or not to Minifig ? (was: Star Wars fixes)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Mon, 7 Jun 1999 13:26:02 GMT
Reply-To: 
[lpien@ctp]nomorespam[.IWANTNOSPAM.com]
Viewed: 
35 times
  
J-Men HQ wrote:

Sorry... but I thought that it was the fact that they were small, lego
representations of people that made them mini-figs.

Why is this over-analyzed?

You collect Lego and you have to ask this question?? :-)

We analyse everything. This is an anal-ytic hobby. Hyphen deliberate. I
love it. Actually, geeks analyse everything. Tell me you're not a geek.
I am, and proud of it.

Yes, the minifig question is supremely irrelevant, as are so many other
controversies in our hobby. Good clean fun.

--
Larry Pieniazek    http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: to Minifig or not to Minifig ? (was: Star Wars fixes)
 
Sorry... but I thought that it was the fact that they were small, lego representations of people that made them mini-figs. Why is this over-analyzed? I say a skeleton IS a mini-fig, just as Jar-Jar is too. They are small figures that fit to a (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)

37 Messages in This Thread:













Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR