Subject:
|
Re: to Minifig or not to Minifig ? (was: Star Wars fixes)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Jun 1999 15:25:36 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
[lpien@ctp.]IHateSpam[iwantnospam.com]
|
Viewed:
|
1685 times
|
| |
|
|
Jasper Janssen wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 May 1999 03:30:46 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
> wrote:
> > SCOTT R DENNETT wrote:
>
> > > Isn't that kinda being contradictory with Jar Jar? I mean he's got
> > > a minifig torso, arms, hands, legs, and even a minifig head, it's
> > > just not round. So you would say that if I took off Jar Jar's head
> > > and put it on Anakin's body that Anakin would no longer be a
> > > minifig??
> >
> > Yes.
>
> You do realise that by that logic, any current day minifig is not a
> minifig by virtue of not having a classic smilie? Or, hell, even by
> virtue of having arms and movable legs...
?? You lost me. I think we're talking about current minifigs, not the
pre 197x ones, and I'm not too concerned about printing. My thesis, such
as it was, is that a minifig has to have a minifig head, of whatever
color and printing, but that just a head is not enough. It has to plug
into a minifig torso. Under my thesis, skeletons, Jar Jar, the new
droids, etc all are interesting, but not minifigs.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
