To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 4029
4028  |  4030
Subject: 
Re: to Minifig or not to Minifig ? (was: Star Wars fixes)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Sat, 8 May 1999 14:02:09 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpien@ctp.iwantnospam.^Spamcake^com
Viewed: 
1614 times
  
Tom Stangl wrote:

But by your definition, JarJar IS a minifig:

No, you're reading it too fast because I wrote it too fast...

"I agree it's gray. but to me a minifig has to have the torso capable of
accepting legs (per the def'n posted), minifig hands, and a minifig
head. "

Capable, HAS, HAS. Jar Jar doesn't HAVE the minifig head, he's only
capable of having it.

The HASes were implied.

--
Larry Pieniazek    http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: to Minifig or not to Minifig ? (was: Star Wars fixes)
 
But by your definition, JarJar IS a minifig: "I agree it's gray. but to me a minifig has to have the torso capable of accepting legs (per the def'n posted), minifig hands, and a minifig head. " The fact that he doesn't come with a standard minifig (...) (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)

37 Messages in This Thread:













Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR