Subject:
|
Re: to Minifig or not to Minifig ? (was: Star Wars fixes)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 May 1999 18:29:40 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@#Spamless#ctp.iwantnospam.com
|
Viewed:
|
1906 times
|
| |
 | |
Ben Gatrelle wrote:
>
> In lugnet.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> <clip discussion about what's a minifig or not>
>
> > I think it'll prove impossible to apply a Yes/No stamp on each character -- it's
> > a Huge Gray Area.
> >
> > --Todd
> I agree, Todd.
> Ben Gatrelle
I agree it's gray. but to me a minifig has to have the torso capable of
accepting legs (per the def'n posted), minifig hands, and a minifig
head. I agree that some of the older space fig robots aren't yellow
headed, nor is Darth. But I'd call them minifigs anyway.
Skeletons, monkeys, Jar Jar, the new robot... all fail.
Todd is right, though, fuzzy associations actually allow for more
precision.
To each his own.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:   
        
           
     
   
                 
         
         
                 
       
          
    
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|