| |
In lugnet.admin.database, lar@voyager.net (Larry Pieniazek) writes:
> Arguably neither Jar Jar nor R2-D2 are minifigs.. minifigs have normal
> heads which rules out Jar Jar, no? And if R-D2 is one, so is the E1
> droid, and so is a skeleton.
There's a real fuzzy line with varying levels of gray. A peg-leg pirate is
maybe only 95% a minifig, and a skeleton only 80% a minifig. Gasgano might
be 25% and the battle droids 40% and Artoo 10%. Threepio might be 90% but
we'll have to wait and see. :) Monkeys with their actual removable minifig
hands are actually closer to minifigs (in this way) than skeletons are...heh
heh. Ahhh, for the love of mayhem. :)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Star Wars fixes
|
| (...) What if you consider a minifig/figure that which is supposedly a sentient character? Another can of worms then, I know, but it's closer. Assuming this definition, it might be prudent to see the movie first to try and determine what fits into (...) (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: Star Wars fixes
|
| (...) Personally, I have Four catagories: Humanoids, Characters, Animals, and The Created(1). Humanoids includes all Minifigs (including Jar-Jar) and Minifig-like figures, like Battle Droids and skeletons. Characters is sorta a catch-all catagory (...) (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
