Subject:
|
Re: Giant Cruiser and MOC contest
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 19:19:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
540 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Bill Jackson writes:
> Mini-Fig scale is the primary scale, but I'm not sure about nano-fig. What
> does everyone think about letting nano-fig entries in? I personally think it
> would ruin the contest.....
How about spliting the contest into 2 catagories. 1 nano-fig and the other
mini-fig. This would let those with smaller collections still participate. I
definitly don't think Mini-Fig and Nano-figs creations should be judged
side-by-side in this instance though.
Eric K,
The New England LEGO Users Group
http://www.nelug.org/
View My Creations at:
http://www.nelug.org/members/kingsley/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Giant Cruiser and MOC contest
|
| (...) Yeah, it's probably best to have them judged seperately, but I feel I have to point out - I wasn't thinking "small" - I was thinking "largest I can pull off with my collection", which is maybe 3 or 4 feet. A Battlestar at minifig scale would (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Giant Cruiser and MOC contest
|
| Mini-Fig scale is the primary scale, but I'm not sure about nano-fig. What does everyone think about letting nano-fig entries in? I personally think it would ruin the contest..... (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.space)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
