Subject:
|
Re: NEW Moc: Container Shuttle Craft CSC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 May 2004 14:37:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1053 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Paul Baulch wrote:
snip
| |
Oh wow! Now I see why everyone was raving. That pneumatic and motorisation is
exactly the sort of thing I’ve been wanting to do, especially for landing
gear. You’ve done it excellently here! Your interiors are cool too.
|
Thank you, Paul. The interiors where great fun to build. That ship was
everything: Technic model, dollhouse, spacecraft and design study.
snip
| |
say that I felt a little disappointed that there was no access tube between
rear and front compartments, but then there’s a lot of internals in that
area.
|
I prefered to have this part of the ship very narrow for several reasons:
1. It should work like a handle when you swosh (or carry...) it around.
2. The ship should look like a bracket around the container.
3. Realistic interior to machine ratio.
But I admit: A connection would have been nice.
| |
Now that you’ve done an “ugly” ship so well, I hope you consider making a
sleek “sexy” ship in the future - but it’s really up to your own tastes :-)
|
The CSC is ugly, your right. I kinda wonder why nobody else noticed ;-).
The little red one isn’t ugly, is it? I
promise I’ll consider building a sleek ship in the future. That is a lot harder
with all those blocky bricks.
Daniel
CSC on mocpages: http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/4033
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NEW Moc: Container Shuttle Craft CSC
|
| (...) Oh wow! Now I see why everyone was raving. That pneumatic and motorisation is exactly the sort of thing I've been wanting to do, especially for landing gear. You've done it excellently here! Your interiors are cool too. (...) Well, I don't (...) (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
