Subject:
|
Re: New Fad? Multi-Level Moonbase
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:54:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1051 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Fred Trayers writes:
> What about establishing a height standard whereby connection corridors could
> be placed at intervals *above* the usual 8 bricks off-the-ground elevations?
> In all other respects, the corridors would adhere to the normal guidelines,
> but they could be located at, say, a height of 24, 40 and 56 bricks. In
> this way, modules might be able to interlock in additional ways, creating a
> bit of a Jetson-ian architecture.
I agree with Fred's sentiments on this. I have thought about building more
modules myself, but time is not likely to allow more than one more out of me
before BrickFest. My concept for my next one will allow for at least three
levels, maybe more depending on if I finally get tired of watching my big
Castle display gather dust (mmm where could I use *this* piece?). If I had
time to build many, I would likely make them connected on more than one
floor. With time to build only one, what are the chances that other
builders will develop second or third floor (not including basement level)
connections? We should agree on a standard for this before I start building
again... :)
-Hendo
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Fad? Multi-Level Moonbase
|
| Hi Folks- Let me begin by saying that I'm a moonbase novice. I've yet to create a module, so feel free to disregard the following comments until you feel that I've been around the block enough... However, one of the limitations of the Moonbase (...) (22 years ago, 7-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
