To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 22674
22673  |  22675
Subject: 
Re: New Fad?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 02:47:23 GMT
Viewed: 
970 times
  
I'd also want two other minimum criteria - each ship has to have an opening
cockpit and working landing gear. That would make the dioramas look better

Ok. I have to strongly disagree here. In my legoverse landing gear is an easily
exploitable weakness on military ships. Landing gear on my military ships (any
size that can land) is always built directly into the hull of the ship to
eliminate it as a (fictitious) structural weakness.

Example:
Galactic Confederation Heavy Fighter model FL-435 "Vengence" or "VeeGee" as the
pilots call them.
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=26066
The third picture shows the underside. Greeblies are also intentionally
minimized to eliminated (fictitious) weaknesses.

IMO. For example:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=369011
As you can see, it doesn't have to be big to have these features.

For civilian craft such as that I have no problem with the idea, but for
military craft it contradicts with my whole design philosophy.

Cheers,
Paul

-Mike Petrucelli



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: New Fad?
 
(...) Perhaps the requirement be that the ship is "functional" so to speak: i.e., there is crew access, and it won't tip to one side or the other when landed. Jeff Benson jbenso1@towson.edu (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
  Re: New Fad?
 
(...) Whoa! My bad. I didn't mean to imply that fixed landing gear was unacceptable, it's totally fine by me. What I meant was that I viewed the presence of landing gear of some kind as mandatory. I've made fighters without landing gear at all, it's (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Fad?
 
(...) Actually, I'd like it to be taken further into a Moonbase-related standard, where the ships can't exceed a certain compact size, say 16 studs by 10 studs by 8 bricks high (for example). Then people can give their moonbase modules parking lots (...) (22 years ago, 7-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)

51 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR