Subject:
|
Re: New Fad?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 03:44:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
894 times
|
| |
|
|
> > I'd also want two other minimum criteria - each ship has to have an opening
> > cockpit and working landing gear. That would make the dioramas look better
>
> Ok. I have to strongly disagree here. In my legoverse landing gear is an easily
> exploitable weakness on military ships. Landing gear on my military ships (any
> size that can land) is always built directly into the hull of the ship to
> eliminate it as a (fictitious) structural weakness.
Perhaps the requirement be that the ship is "functional" so to speak: i.e.,
there is crew access, and it won't tip to one side or the other when landed.
Jeff Benson
jbenso1@towson.edu
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Fad?
|
| (...) Ok. I have to strongly disagree here. In my legoverse landing gear is an easily exploitable weakness on military ships. Landing gear on my military ships (any size that can land) is always built directly into the hull of the ship to eliminate (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
