Subject:
|
Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:51:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2354 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <002301c0c0db$d4003c90$610b010a@soporcel.pt>,
<marco@soporcel.pt> wrote:
> I only wished NQC 2.2x still listed the "Variable name = number" head
> list,
> in the window the shows the source code produced by NQC (can't remember
> the
> name of that window, sorry).
> But that's one question I have to ask to Dave Baum.
Yeah, that went away as soon as I started using the RCX 2.0 locals for
variable allocation - the symbolic information just didn't survive the
rework. And I completely forgot to put it back in.
I'm working on enhancing the listing a bit. I'll put the variable
name/location information back in.
Dave
--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| I've tested your RcxCC version, and it works great with RCX2 (AFAIK). (ah, and still works simultaneously with CyberMaster too, eheh) That reminds me, one very useful thing for people working with various pBricks simultaneously (like myself), would (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
