Subject:
|
Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 18:13:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2219 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Dave Baum writes:
>
> You can probably use NQC to implement a lot of the other fancy features
> as well. The "-raw" option for NQC lets you send raw byte packets.
> You'd need to figure out the actual bytecodes from Lego's LASM document,
> but you wouldn't have to worry about the communication itself. I know
> its not as easy as spirit.ocx, but if there were one or two "essential"
> features you could add them this way. If you try this and get stuck let
> me know and I'll try to help out.
I am considering taking advantage of the -raw option on NQC or possibly the
-remote option to further enable RcxCC in the absence of Spirit.ocx. Of
course, most users of RcxCC will have spirit.ocx, but Scout users may not.
I'm not planning on spending a huge amount of time on this aspect of my
revisions to RcxCC.
I am placing a revised RcxCC at
http://members.aol.com/~johnbinder/rcxcc.zip
It contains a modified rcxcc.exe and a new Default sub-directory. To get
the syntax highlighting to start working you'll need to delete the RCXCC
registry key under HKCU.
I've enabled picking your own color/style scheme for the syntax highlighting
but I won't have that revised zip up until later this evening.
John Hansen
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| (...) Looking into the way syntax highlighting is performed in RcxCC revealed a few "features" that I find undesirable. In my experience, the Undo doesn't really work right. It also appears to be counting the change of highlighting as a (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| I feel pretty stupid asking this question, but I can't seem to solve the problem myself. When I try to compile a program using John's RcxCC tool I keep getting the message: Unable to execute NQC. Check your installation. I'm running Windows 98. To (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| (...) You can probably use NQC to implement a lot of the other fancy features as well. The "-raw" option for NQC lets you send raw byte packets. You'd need to figure out the actual bytecodes from Lego's LASM document, but you wouldn't have to worry (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
