Subject:
|
Re: An Idea for new Mindstorm
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:43:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1301 times
|
| |
|
|
Isn't it a bit of a contradiction to have a person who wants to build robots,
but doesn't want to program? A true robot, of the kind we see on this newsgroup,
is a harmonious blend of decent programming and decent construction. If you take
the programming element out, all you're doing is building another Technic model,
albeit slightly more complex. I don't see a market for this kind of thing in my
area at all: everyone I know either is an excellent roboticist, or hasn't the
slightest interest in robotics. Just my few, random thoughts on the matter.
Andrew Meyer
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | RE: An Idea for new Mindstorm
|
| When I read this Idea about no programming, I thought you guys must be crazy. The programming is the coolest part of this system. I'd like to see Lego do more with the programming capabilities not less. -----Original Message----- From: (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: An Idea for new Mindstorm
|
| (...) Yes, exactly - some models have to be just small step behind Technic. It will allow people to easy shift from "just Technic" to robotics. Currently, there are too large gap between Technic and Mindstorm, I think. If filled, it will allow (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: An Idea for new Mindstorm
|
| (...) I have to agree. If you don't want to build programmable robots, why not just build a motorized model with a motor and battery box. The whole point of Mindstorms, as I see it, is that you "add" programming to a structure of Lego elements to (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
