|
> Nick Taylor wrote:
>
> > Rcvd my pneumatic components yesterday ... and
> > am having doubts about their practicality. The smaller
> > cylinder and pump (5116 & 5117) are not powerful
> > enough to do much of amything of any use.
> The small cylinders are of great use for actuators & orther small "switching"
> tasks... not good for lifting.
I'll soon post photos of the double pump I designed based on the
single cylinder one on Mike?'s site. It has a smoother power stroke when the
tank fills up. I still need to design a regulator though.
The small cylinder is used as the bucket actuator in my excavator. Note
the use of a mechanical "amplifier" to get more travel. For photos of
this MOC see...
www.bmts.com/~rhempel and follow your nose...
Cheers,
Ralph Hempel - P.Eng
------------------------------------------------------
The train stops at the train station,
The bus stops at the bus station,
So why am I sitting at a work station?
------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: rhempel at bmts dot com
------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: pneumatics & mindstorms?
|
| (...) The small cylinders are of great use for actuators & orther small "switching" tasks... not good for lifting. (...) I have been disappointed in the "compressor" pump... It does not generate a very consistant presure, and it seems to have been (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|