Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto14 AC issue and entrants
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:36:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
548 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
> > if you want to enforce the entanglement issue, then you should change
> > the rule to suggest that you are not allow to have your "tail" entangle
> > another robot. Bruce said it best. if my ONE wire trailing out the back
> > of the stationary robot looks like it might be in the way of iain, who
> > will build an autonomous invasion robot... then I can pick up the wire.
>
> No, actually, you'll be building a mechanism to keep the wire up over other
> robots. Because there should be no human intervention.
> I agree with Steve:
!?!? :)
>
> "could be replaced with something that doesn't say "External Power" is not
> allowed, but says that "cables that can tangle other robots" are not
> allowed."
Yes. And, someone could easily say "well, my cord won't tangle other robots."
But...
> As for what happens, my tendancy is that if it gets caught up, the robot
> with the wire gets the match disqualified and the one that got tangled
> wins automatically.
...If it does, they lose.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: rtlToronto14 AC issue and entrants
|
| (...) The same reasons why we say you can't drop 1200 pieces or be larger than 18" cubed. I care if it gives an unnecessary benefit that everyone else doesn't have. Like, we don't allow John Barnes sensors because not everyone has them and they're (...) (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
47 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
