To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 8813
8812  |  8814
Subject: 
Re: rtlToronto14 AC issue and entrants
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:36:23 GMT
Viewed: 
465 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Benjamin Medinets wrote:

So is it because I brought it back up that I
am making the assumption, or is it because I am not a robot guy???

What I don't undersatnd is why you're geting involved with this.

Of course.  So if you wanted to continue to compete you would need additional
batteries, and take time out to install your firmware and your programs.
Which would might make your robot unable to compete "at a moments notice".

No, removing the batteries does not clear the firmware and programming - it
takes only a minute if you have your RCX easily accessable (by good machine
design).  A poor design would leave the RCX embeded in the machine,
inaccessable, so people could use the excuse "I need power because I can't get
at my RCX".

The alternate view on this is that the general consensus could be build a
smarter design that allows alternate sources of kinetic energy...ie multi-geared
assemblies, pneumatics, battery boxes, etc.

What about perpetual motion machines, Ben?  My robot is powered by a Finsrud,
how does that fit with this?  Is that okay?

    Iain



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: rtlToronto14 AC issue and entrants
 
(...) Want the honest reason. The discussion regarding this either way (YES vs NO) has been largely SUBJECTIVE without a whole lot of reason. I would like to hear some OBJECTIVE reasons and find out the pros and cons of using AC power. I would like (...) (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: rtlToronto14 AC issue and entrants
 
(...) Well, agreeing with Wayne about saving batteries isn't a good reason for voting "no" (just to screw your fellow competitors). I was just re-emphasizing what Calum said in an earlier post, "Yeah, sure you do. I won't take the excuse you can't (...) (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

47 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR