To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 8813
8812  |  8814
Subject: 
Re: rtlToronto14 AC issue and entrants
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:36:23 GMT
Viewed: 
1514 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Benjamin Medinets wrote:

> So is it because I brought it back up that I
> am making the assumption, or is it because I am not a robot guy???

What I don't undersatnd is why you're geting involved with this.

> Of course.  So if you wanted to continue to compete you would need additional
> batteries, and take time out to install your firmware and your programs.
> Which would might make your robot unable to compete "at a moments notice".

No, removing the batteries does not clear the firmware and programming - it
takes only a minute if you have your RCX easily accessable (by good machine
design).  A poor design would leave the RCX embeded in the machine,
inaccessable, so people could use the excuse "I need power because I can't get
at my RCX".

> The alternate view on this is that the general consensus could be build a
> smarter design that allows alternate sources of kinetic energy...ie multi-geared
> assemblies, pneumatics, battery boxes, etc.

What about perpetual motion machines, Ben?  My robot is powered by a Finsrud,
how does that fit with this?  Is that okay?

    Iain



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: rtlToronto14 AC issue and entrants
 
(...) Want the honest reason. The discussion regarding this either way (YES vs NO) has been largely SUBJECTIVE without a whole lot of reason. I would like to hear some OBJECTIVE reasons and find out the pros and cons of using AC power. I would like (...) (23 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: rtlToronto14 AC issue and entrants
 
(...) Well, agreeing with Wayne about saving batteries isn't a good reason for voting "no" (just to screw your fellow competitors). I was just re-emphasizing what Calum said in an earlier post, "Yeah, sure you do. I won't take the excuse you can't (...) (23 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

47 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR