Subject:
|
Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:02:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
597 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Richard Noeckel writes:
> > Iian wrote:
> > How was I supposed to know someone felt it
> > necissary to tattle to .general.admin?
>
> Thats EXACTLY- how I felt!
> Whyd Tim have to Five-O u on such a minor statement?
> He could of just ignored it and let it pass.
Yep. I could have. I could have thought, 'why waste my time' and totally
disregard the concern I have for the betterment of LUGNET.
> (Its not like the whole newsgroup was about to be spammed by lewd-anagrams!)
> This just totally wastes Suz time and makes her deal with irrelevant stuff.
> (OR)
> At the most, Tim could have just sent an e-mail presentin his distaste for
> your statement.
> ~But he didnt!!!!!!!!
> (Thats why I took the time to attribute the appropriate anagram to ol Timmy!)
> [I thought it mirrored his rash anal-retentive intolerance.]
If it isn't entirely obvious, I don't have much regard for this slippery
slope opinion. This isn't Richard Noeckel Net. This is LUGNET. There are
rules here. And there are people who want to see this a pleasant place.
You don't own the RTLToronoto group on this server. On another server,
perhaps. This one, no. If it makes me unpopular with a small group of
people to express my concern, so be it. You are each responsible for your
own actions here. Yes, freedom of expression is good. But, not everything
is appropriate expression for LUGNET. The TOS *and* the LUGNET community
are kid-friendly. Take it or leave it.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
| (...) Tim, I understand your good intentions. I think no one is doubting that Iain and Richard were against TOS. And you're right, we're all the guests of Todd/Suzanne or whoever is running Lugnet these days. However, you also have no authority for (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
33 Messages in This Thread: ![Attack of the ABS addiction -Benjamin Medinets (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction -Richard Noeckel (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction -Calum Tsang (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction -Benjamin Medinets (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Richard Noeckel (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Iain Hendry (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Tim Courtney (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Suzanne D. Rich (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Benjamin Medinets (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Iain Hendry (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Benjamin Medinets (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Richard Noeckel (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Chris Magno (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -John Neal (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Buddhism -Richard Noeckel (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Dave Johann (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Calum Tsang (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Ross Crawford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Richard Noeckel (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Honorary member! -Ross Crawford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Calum Tsang (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Ross Crawford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -Jeff Van Winden (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -David Koudys (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -Chris Magno (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -David Koudys (17-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Calum Tsang (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Tim Courtney (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Larry Pieniazek (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -David Koudys (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Allan Bedford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Trevyn Watson (17-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|