Subject:
|
Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:53:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
605 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
> Iian wrote:
> How was I supposed to know someone felt it
> necissary to tattle to .general.admin?
Thats EXACTLY- how I felt!
Whyd Tim have to Five-O u on such a minor statement?
He could of just ignored it and let it pass.
(Its not like the whole newsgroup was about to be spammed by lewd-anagrams!)
This just totally wastes Suz time and makes her deal with irrelevant stuff.
(OR)
At the most, Tim could have just sent an e-mail presentin his distaste for
your statement.
~But he didnt!!!!!!!!
(Thats why I took the time to attribute the appropriate anagram to ol Timmy!)
[I thought it mirrored his rash anal-retentive intolerance.]
> Ben wrote:
> hey Bro, all you had to do was remove the lugnet.general newsgroup from
> your posting....that would have saved everyone from trouble...
---
Sometimes I just wanna *ignore Ben!
But hes a good guy so I'll tolerate. ;)
*I say this cause he +AlwayS gives a reply to every post
even when the post
is meant to be a one-point statement, a la Mr. K!
---
But, to answer Bens comment, I'll just reiterate my past post;
It was left in .general cause the response was relevant to the context.
Sincerely,
--==Richard==--
-Holy Freudian phallic afflictions Batman!
P.S. You know whats kinda funny?
The way Calum and Chris M. totally hang their heads in shame
when things like this get outta hand.
I can see them going;
Oh god, there goes Iian
and great, Richards gone all Defender of
Free-Speech on us. This is sure to make us look bad! 8)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
| (...) Sorry, Richard. I cant speak for Calum. I can speak for me. I personally was not going to wade into this BUT you did bring up my name. I was not/ am not hanging my head in shame. What happened, happened. It was unfortunate that Iain, did not (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
33 Messages in This Thread: ![Attack of the ABS addiction -Benjamin Medinets (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction -Richard Noeckel (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction -Calum Tsang (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction -Benjamin Medinets (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Richard Noeckel (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Iain Hendry (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Tim Courtney (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Suzanne D. Rich (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Benjamin Medinets (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Iain Hendry (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Benjamin Medinets (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Chris Magno (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -John Neal (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Buddhism -Richard Noeckel (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Dave Johann (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Calum Tsang (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Ross Crawford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Richard Noeckel (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Honorary member! -Ross Crawford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Calum Tsang (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Ross Crawford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -Jeff Van Winden (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -David Koudys (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -Chris Magno (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -David Koudys (17-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Tim Courtney (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Calum Tsang (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Tim Courtney (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Larry Pieniazek (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -David Koudys (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Allan Bedford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Trevyn Watson (17-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|