Subject:
|
Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 03:43:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
628 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:
> > P.S. You know what’s kinda funny?
> > The way Calum and Chris M. totally hang their heads in shame
> > when things like this get outta hand.
> > I can see them going;
> > ‘Oh god, there goes Iian… and great, Richard’s gone all ‘Defender of
> > Free-Speech’ on us. This is sure to make us look bad!” 8)
Richard: In some ways, yes, but I see your point and it is a valid one. I'm
glad SOMEONE is defending free speech, even though the TOS is clearly
stated. I also had a good chuckle-you're a funny guy, I liked your
immediate response to Tim :)
> Once things leave the comfort and safety of RTLToronto, who's to guess
> what people will do or say. We "get away" with a lot of stuff here.
I dunno, unlike the continuous baiting between various Lugnet
"personalities" on other groups, rtlToronto is pretty tame. I don't think
we really get away with anything. But I do think there's an unusual amount
of non GTA folk reading rtlToronto. Who are they? I don't know.
> lets get back to trains and robots.
Yup. Train3 this weekend, rtl10 a month later. rtlToronto coming back at
ya full force. Aaaight.
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
| (...) Sorry, Richard. I cant speak for Calum. I can speak for me. I personally was not going to wade into this BUT you did bring up my name. I was not/ am not hanging my head in shame. What happened, happened. It was unfortunate that Iain, did not (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
