Subject:
|
Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:39:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
613 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang writes:
> Tim, I understand your good intentions. I think no one is doubting that
> Iain and Richard were against TOS. And you're right, we're all the guests
> of Todd/Suzanne or whoever is running Lugnet these days. However, you also
> have no authority for the rtlToronto NG, and this is what I've sort of bit
> my tongue on for the last day or so:
Certainly I understand I have no authority in your NG. But, the TOS does
have an authority in your NG. The comments were crossposted to a mainstream
part of LUGNET too. While I would still find the post distasteful, I would
have less of a problem with it were it kept here.
> I find your self appointed, self rationalized, policing a little arrogant.
> I've spoken to a few people here in Toronto this evening and I think it's
> the crosspost to admin/general that flaunted pseudo-authority that got me
> and others a bit ticked. You don't get to say "Take it or leave it",
> Suzanne does.*
Community policing is a good thing, I strongly believe this. It is up to
each and every upstanding member of LUGNET to see to it that the environment
here stays kid-friendly and pleasant. My original post was anything but
impolite. The responses from the RTLToronto gang (spare your post here)
have been anything but polite. I stand by my words and actions.
I have said my piece. Out of respect, and a desire for the issue to die, I
will not discuss this matter further in your newsgroup. Thanks for engaging
me rationally, I'm certainly more willing to hear out a post like this than
ones laiden with juvinile complaints or insults.
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
| (...) Tim, I understand your good intentions. I think no one is doubting that Iain and Richard were against TOS. And you're right, we're all the guests of Todd/Suzanne or whoever is running Lugnet these days. However, you also have no authority for (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
33 Messages in This Thread: ![Attack of the ABS addiction -Benjamin Medinets (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction -Richard Noeckel (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction -Calum Tsang (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction -Benjamin Medinets (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Richard Noeckel (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Iain Hendry (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Tim Courtney (14-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Suzanne D. Rich (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Benjamin Medinets (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Iain Hendry (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Benjamin Medinets (15-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Richard Noeckel (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Chris Magno (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -John Neal (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Buddhism -Richard Noeckel (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Dave Johann (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Calum Tsang (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Ross Crawford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Richard Noeckel (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Honorary member! -Ross Crawford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Calum Tsang (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Ross Crawford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -Jeff Van Winden (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -David Koudys (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -Chris Magno (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) -David Koudys (17-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Tim Courtney (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Calum Tsang (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Larry Pieniazek (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -David Koudys (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general -Allan Bedford (16-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) -Trevyn Watson (17-Jan-02 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|