| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Michael Purvis wrote:
> Agree. In the final and semifinals, we should play with both getting a chance to
> move first... but with the first rounds, the winners should be pretty clear. I
> still doubt we're going to see the 'perfect solution'. Steve?
I agree.
> Anyhow, I know there was some discussion about the no-fly zone before, and I
> wasn't sure if we came to a final conclusion... anyway, I definitely need at
> least four studs on either side of the board. If no one else needs this extra
> space, I can redesign my drivebase, but it would be nice to have the final word.
I expect most people will need more space, which is why I suggested changing it,
but it's been stated that the posted rules should not be changed at this late
date.
Luckily, I had two weeks off, over the holidays, so I was able to do a MAJOR
rebuild on my robot, to get it to fit into the allowed space.
The good news is that you still have a little over three weeks to rebuild yours.
:)
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: ply vs turn
|
| (...) This issue has frustrated me too. I was there for the original discussion about what the common area should be. When we original discussed it we included extra space to either side of the board. However Someone didn't draw it that way, so we (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: ply vs turn
|
| (...) Agree. In the final and semifinals, we should play with both getting a chance to move first... but with the first rounds, the winners should be pretty clear. I still doubt we're going to see the 'perfect solution'. Steve? Regarding the timing, (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
