Subject:
|
Re: Truck factors (was Re: Instructions on CD ROM?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Aug 1999 11:24:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
368 times
|
| |
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote
> Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> writes:
> > While some happy AFOL may rejoice if he buys your entire collection
> > for 1000 because your family doesn't know better, wouldn't you rather
> > they got a fair price for it?
> Doesn't this mean that one would have to actually tell one's family how
> much one spends on LEGO? I can see that some may think that their
> family is better off not knowing this. :-)
Keep in mind that you are the named beneficiary of at least one will when
saying this, Mr Glockner.
My family are currently minding my collection, but I don't think they
realised its real extent yet. It's not obvious unless you think about
it that 100kgs of Lego costs rather a lot, and some of us just have Lego
in those boxes, no packaging or steel reinforcing.
Moz
(who has no idea how much it really weighs, but the boxes are rather
heavy, and there are rather a lot of them)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Truck factors (was Re: Instructions on CD ROM?
|
| (...) I am? Wow, I had no idea of that. (...) Here in Norway, most people realize that LEGO is a high quality, expensive construction toy. It is my impression, although I haven't actually got any statistics for it, that only very few would ever give (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
