|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) writes:
> > You know, as much as I like you guys, and as much respect I have for
> > the Great One, I really wish Todd would create
> > lugnet.off-topic.very-painfully-bad.and.sometimes.just.bad.puns so I
> > could go back to reading computer geek stuff in .fun.
>
> Hmm, a group like that could certainly be a lot of pun. Actually, I think
> people have secretly been lusting after this for months.
Well, lusting after it might be a stretch. Hoping and praying that I
won't ever have to read another one again might be more accurate. :)
>
> Would you call it
> lugnet.off-topic.pun
> or
> lugnet.off-topic.puns
> or
> lugnet.off-topic.fun.pun
> or
> lugnet.off-topic.fun.puns
I like the first one. Please make it happen as quickly as possible.
> You know: If a group does get created for this, you can bet your punless
> acre that a couple of people here will gang up on you and post gratuitous
> followups in the your honor for a whole week -- just to thwart you. :)
I can put up with that if I know that the vast majority of them will
go somewhere else from now on. :)
--
Lego Shop at Home: 800-835-4386 (USA) / 800-267-5346 (Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - A great new resource for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lar's hoppers
|
| (...) Hmm, a group like that could certainly be a lot of pun. Actually, I think people have secretly been lusting after this for months. Would you call it lugnet.off-topic.pun or lugnet.off-topic.puns or lugnet.off-topic.fun.pun or (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|