| |
Ed Jones <edboxer@aol.com> wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> > I suppose I'd be pretty content with anything ranking at a 3 or higher.
> > What d'y'all think?
>
> I don't think we need a pun group. I don't think, but I could be wrong,
> that the original requestors were serious. Puns are going to occur all over
You're wrong. I was serious.
> However, to your dissertation (that I snipped), I'd agree with:
>
> off-topic.geek - computers, programming, font discussions, etc. needs its own
> group - especially with the number of programmers, web designers, etc. on
> LUGNET (not to mention that it bores us non-geeks to tears :') (my other half
> is a geek).
Definitely a go.
> off-topic.quotes - in fact I saw an incredible T-shirt today - "Hang out with
> Jesus, he hung out for you" (several ways to look at this - bad taste,
> hysterical, really week religious advertising, etc.)
Works for me.
--
Lego Shop at Home: 800-835-4386 (USA) / 800-267-5346 (Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - A great new resource for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: .off-topic groups
|
| (...) I don't think we need a pun group. I don't think, but I could be wrong, that the original requestors were serious. Puns are going to occur all over the groups anyway. You'd be forced (by some disgruntled posters) to "police" puns in other (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
