To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8321
8320  |  8322
Subject: 
Re: It IS about Taxation
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 22 Dec 2000 17:03:24 GMT
Viewed: 
966 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> 
> > In any instance of distribution of my wealth, if I have
> > given permission, it is not theft.  But I think that anyone who wants my
> > wealth should ask, rather than seize.
> 
>  Can it not be argued that by participating in the monetary system deployed
> by a government (in accordance, in the US, with the Constitution) a tax is
> simply a "service charge" for using goverment property (money)?  That is, if
> you don't want to pay tax, don't trade in the coin of the realm.  If you use
> money as distributed by the Fed, tax is a corresponding duty for that use.
>  I'm just asking--this isn't necessarily my view, but I'm curious about its
> validity as an argument. If this is plowed ground, let me know.

Yes it can be so argued... (and yes, it's a bit plowed but worth reexamination)

A few points to consider:

- While the constitution speaks of coinage, it does not reserve coinage as a
(federal OR state) government monopoly.
- Coinage nevertheless is a defacto monopoly in the US, if you attempt to
establish a currency of your own, even an interconvertable one, you will be
in trouble with the feds.
- the IRS has held that barter that results in income is taxable. (when for
example,  Chris trades his jars of clay to me for a Jars of Clay CD, that's
an income event, since he added value to the clay when he turned it into
jars and thus it's a taxable event)

I'd support a usage charge by the government for use of their currency if I
was allowed to arrange my affairs so as not to use their currency if I so
chose. (and thus, instead, pay a usage charge to the First Bank of Filz when
I used THEIR currency if that's what they levied)

Good question though.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: It IS about Taxation
 
(...) Wow. I didn't know you were into the music of Jars of Clay, Lar... or were you just waxing poetic? -John (...) (26 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: It IS about Taxation
 
(...) Can it not be argued that by participating in the monetary system deployed by a government (in accordance, in the US, with the Constitution) a tax is simply a "service charge" for using goverment property (money)? That is, if you don't want to (...) (26 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

29 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR