Subject:
|
Re: (Sub|Ob)jectivity and related case studies on .debate (...or is it just about taxation :-)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:26:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
234 times
|
| |
| |
<original message snipped>
Generally I don't feel right blowing my own trumpet, guys, but I feel that
the reputation (and possibly the future!) of this NG is at stake here. If
you have the time, feel free to take a few minutes to read a post I made in
another thread:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=8250
I'm not intending to make any personal criticism, I just thought that (the
post I'm replying to here) was a reasonable example of a post that could be
trimmed of many of its assertions/rebuttals. I'm not saying that they're
irrelevant to the discussion, I'm saying that they could be eliminated from
the discussion without important information being lost.
In short, I think that we ought to be trimming down what we reply to, and
that the debates wil benefit enormously as a result.
Thanks for reading!
Cheers,
Paul
LUGNET member 164
http://www.geocities.com/doctorshnub/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|