To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8301
8300  |  8302
Subject: 
Re: (Sub|Ob)jectivity and related case studies on .debate (...or is it just about taxation :-)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:26:01 GMT
Viewed: 
234 times
  
<original message snipped>

Generally I don't feel right blowing my own trumpet, guys, but I feel that
the reputation (and possibly the future!) of this NG is at stake here. If
you have the time, feel free to take a few minutes to read a post I made in
another thread:

http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=8250

I'm not intending to make any personal criticism, I just thought that (the
post I'm replying to here) was a reasonable example of a post that could be
trimmed of many of its assertions/rebuttals. I'm not saying that they're
irrelevant to the discussion, I'm saying that they could be eliminated from
the discussion without important information being lost.

In short, I think that we ought to be trimming down what we reply to, and
that the debates wil benefit enormously as a result.
Thanks for reading!

Cheers,
Paul
LUGNET member 164
http://www.geocities.com/doctorshnub/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: (Sub|Ob)jectivity and related case studies on .debate (...or is it just about taxation :-)
 
<topped> (...) <tailed> I think you have a good point Paul. However, I think there is also value in replying point by point as one can quickly see where the main arguments lie. I enjoy ready through long, well reasoned, text - but without printing (...) (24 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  (Sub|Ob)jectivity and related case studies on .debate (...or is it just about taxation :-)
 
Kevin and Frank are right, this discussion didn't belong in that thread. My bad. It kind of crept up on me. (...) Would you prefer "the forceful (when necessary) realocation of resources?" Theft is much shorter. It is more convenient to call it (...) (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

29 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR