Subject:
|
Re: It IS about Taxation ;-) (Was Re: (Sub|Ob)jectivity and related case studies on .debate (...or is it just about taxation :-)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Dec 2000 15:32:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
326 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > > And substituting words, you ask "Why does organization-x need permission to
> > > steal from you?" In any instance of distribution of my wealth, if I have • given
> > > permission, it is not theft. But I think that anyone who wants my wealth
> > > should ask, rather than seize.
> >
> > Do they not ask you each and every time there is an election in the US?
> > Sure, I expect you were out-voted - but that is democracy for you!
> > ...In that context, how can taxation be theft?
>
> Your stace here is (if I understand you correctly) that since a bunch of people
> think taking my money is OK, that I don't have a right to call it theft.
I think, we are back to where we started on this one.
Scott A
>
> I don't think that makes any sense. No number of opinions in favor, make
> stealing OK. No number of opinions in favor of servitude based on skin tone
> makes it moral. No number of opinions stating that murdering left-handed
> children is appropriate makes it so. Evil is evil. Stealing, murdering, and
> enslavement are all (generally) evil. The fact that things run
> (somewhat) smoothly if we participate in evil doesn't make it a good thing to
> do.
>
> Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
