Debate : 6955


Off-Topic / Debate / 6955	6954 \| 6956

Subject:	U.S. federal income taxes not legal? (was: Re: Can Harry Browne do it?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.loc.us
Date:	Mon, 6 Nov 2000 00:13:45 GMT
Viewed:	716 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Todd Lehman writes: > I've gotta look this up to be sure, because I couldn't believe my ears, but > I thought that Browne said there was no federal income tax before something > like 1913. [...] Ah yes, here it is...the 16th Amendment. http://www.constitution.org/constit_.htm http://www.constitution.org/afterte_.htm#amd16 http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj14n3-1.html http://www.trimonline.org/congress/articles/before_tax.htm http://www.americannonconformist.com/incometax.html http://www.taxableincome.net/ http://www.bigeye.com/fedtax.htm --Todd [crossposted to .off-topic.debate & .loc.us]

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: U.S. federal income taxes not legal? (was: Re: Can Harry Browne do it?)
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G3Ktyx.9ts@lugnet.com... (...) but (...) something (...) -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - Centralized LDraw Resources (URL) - Zacktron Alliance ICQ: 23951114 - AIM: TimCourtne (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.loc.us)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Can Harry Browne do it?
(...) I've gotta look this up to be sure, because I couldn't believe my ears, but I thought that Browne said there was no federal income tax before something like 1913. If I heard that correctly and it's true, it means that there are people alive (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

27 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search