Debate : 6957


Off-Topic / Debate / 6957	6956 \| 6958

Subject:	Re: U.S. federal income taxes not legal? (was: Re: Can Harry Browne do it?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.loc.us
Date:	Mon, 6 Nov 2000 00:21:14 GMT
Viewed:	870 times

"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G3Ktyx.9ts@lugnet.com... > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Todd Lehman writes: > > I've gotta look this up to be sure, because I couldn't believe my ears, • but > > I thought that Browne said there was no federal income tax before • something > > like 1913. [...] > > Ah yes, here it is...the 16th Amendment. > > http://www.constitution.org/constit_.htm > http://www.constitution.org/afterte_.htm#amd16 > http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj14n3-1.html > http://www.trimonline.org/congress/articles/before_tax.htm > http://www.americannonconformist.com/incometax.html > http://www.taxableincome.net/ > http://www.bigeye.com/fedtax.htm Oh, didn't even see that :D -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com http://www.ldraw.org - Centralized LDraw Resources http://www.zacktron.com - Zacktron Alliance ICQ: 23951114 - AIM: TimCourtne

Message is in Reply To:

		U.S. federal income taxes not legal? (was: Re: Can Harry Browne do it?)
(...) Ah yes, here it is...the 16th Amendment. (URL) to .off-topic.debate & .loc.us] (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.loc.us)

27 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search