Debate : 6988


Off-Topic / Debate / 6988	6987 \| 6989

Subject:	Re: Can any third party candidate do it? (was Re: Can Harry Browne do it?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 7 Nov 2000 06:20:10 GMT
Viewed:	263 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Shiri Dori writes: > Of course, he won't get even one Electoral College vote this time around. A trivia point: The first woman to get an Electoral College vote... was no Geraldine Ferraro! It was a Libertarian, several elections earlier. Of course, after that electoral college voter voted his conscience, the laws of his state were tightened (and rightly so, actually) to more closely bind votes to the popular outcome. (although winner take all isn't such a great system, I'd rather see a direct popular election) The history of why we have an Electoral College is fascinating. As with so many things in our constitution, it was a compromise to ensure small state support for ratification. ++Lar

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Can any third party candidate do it? (was Re: Can Harry Browne do it?)
(...) Me too. Elections are complex enough as is, no need to make it more confusing for the people with indirect voting. What you get is in fact not people's wishes. (...) Yep. I've actually spent the past few weeks learning about that. I'm pretty (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Can any third party candidate do it? (was Re: Can Harry Browne do it?)
Hi Todd- A vote is never wasted, IMHO. Personally, if I could, I'd vote for Nader. In MA, that is. In a swing state, no (anything to keep Bush from becoming president...). Then again; I'm not a US citizen, nor over 18. Oh well. It seems to me that (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

27 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search