Subject:
|
Re: Personality test vs. Religion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:07:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2682 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
>
> Actually, casual observation is in fact more useful than the test. The test
> will only return results like "Bob's a great guy," "Bob's a swell
> guy," "Bob's a nice guy," "Bob's a fine guy," etc. Casual-but-honest
> observation, though hardly scientific, is probably more usefully applicable
> to daily interaction than a test that only returns generally positive
> answers.
Personally, I would take any of these observations!
:-)
Bob
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Personality test vs. Religion
|
| (...) I'm sorry, but this hypothetical example doesn't interest me. Suppose I posit a car that delivers infinite gas mileage--wouldn't you buy it? Heck, yes! But what's the point? It's not difficult to create examples that have no relation to (...) (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
53 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
