Subject:
|
Re: Personality test vs. Religion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Nov 2004 21:04:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2568 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Schuler wrote:
> My argument is that the test is inadequate as the tool it is marketed
> and sold to be; namely, it is marketed and sold as a tool of
> professional and/or career planning, and it is not suited to that
> role.
Hmm, I've never seen it used or marketted in that way. I've mostly seen it
used as a self exploration tool, and perhaps a tool for understanding one's
co-workers a bit better.
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Personality test vs. Religion
|
| (...) Well, I have the sense that this website is somehow connected with the M/B test: (URL) the site is replete with purchasing opportunities. Similarly, this website is run by the owners of the Meyers-Briggs instrument, and they seem more than (...) (20 years ago, 1-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Personality test vs. Religion
|
| (...) Well, it was designed, was it not? And presumably the designers made deliberate choices to include some results and not others, right? QED. (...) Sure, they *may* do that, just as tea leaves *may* tell you who you're going to marry. Let me (...) (20 years ago, 1-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
53 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
