Debate : 21660


Off-Topic / Debate / 21660	21659 \| 21661

Subject:	Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:47:01 GMT
Viewed:	243 times

There was no trial. There is no evidence. Sure, there are allegations. All I do know is that two persons alleged to be Saddam’s children and likewise alleged to be criminals against humanity were killed.

So are you asserting that because they never had their day in court, they were innocent?

What ever happened to “innocent until proven guilty”?

BTW: How hypocritical will it be if (as has been suggested) Rumsfeld publishes pictures of their bodies?

Scott A

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
(...) That can't be applicable, the institutions whose legitimacy for trial was recognized have been overpassed. Trial would therefore be a farce without an impartial judge. (...) No longer "if". IMO it's just a question of taste (or sensibility, if (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
(...) So are you asserting that because they never had their day in court, they were innocent? (...) Your comparison is, if not completely laughable, not analogous. (...) Dude, to go out in a blaze of glory was their decision! I read a quotation (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

26 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search