To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21692
21691  |  21693
Subject: 
Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:37:03 GMT
Viewed: 
312 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   Dude, to go out in a blaze of glory was their decision!

Wrong again, John...that blaze of glory seems to have been more of a fizzle. It appears they were taken out with an overwhelming amount of force. Of course, it may have been strategically better to have taken them alive too.

Excessive Force?

http://www.msnbc.com/m/pt/printthis.asp?storyID=943255

Excessive Force?

The U.S. military is celebrating the deaths of Saddam’s sons. But some are questioning whether Uday and Qusay could - and should - have been taken alive.

-- Hop-Frog



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
 
(...) A thoroughly good read as well: (URL) K (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
 
(...) So are you asserting that because they never had their day in court, they were innocent? (...) Your comparison is, if not completely laughable, not analogous. (...) Dude, to go out in a blaze of glory was their decision! I read a quotation (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

26 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR