Debate : 21657


Off-Topic / Debate / 21657	21656 \| 21658

Subject:	Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 24 Jul 2003 03:30:27 GMT
Viewed:	212 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:

It matters a great deal to the Iraqi people. “Death of the kids”? Or how about “death of the murderous, sadistic thugs”? Look how pathetically partisan you’ve become-- criticizing the deaths of 2 pieces of human excrement. Sad, really. I suppose you will light a candle when we hand over SH’s head on a platter to the Iraqi people...

Your certainty confounds me AGAIN!

There was no trial. There is no evidence. Sure, there are allegations. All I do know is that two persons alleged to be Saddam’s children and likewise alleged to be criminals against humanity were killed.

So are you asserting that because they never had their day in court, they were innocent?

I think there are people in D.C. that are criminals against humanity; but I don’t actively seek their blood, I just want them out of office ASAP with as little fuss as possible.

Your comparison is, if not completely laughable, not analogous.

Get with the program and step into this century. These guys should have been captured and brought before an international tribunal that could have passed judgment on both the criminals and their captors.

This yahoo justice sickens me.

Dude, to go out in a blaze of glory was their decision! I read a quotation from an Iraqis who said he was sorry to hear that the pair had been killed. He commented that he’d wished they been sufficiently tortured first. They knew what capture would have meant.

JOHN

Message has 3 Replies:

		Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
(...) What ever happened to “innocent until proven guilty”? BTW: How hypocritical will it be if (as has been suggested) Rumsfeld publishes pictures of their bodies? Scott A (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

		Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
(...) Y'know, I cannot recall a single instance before the administration of Shrub where the idea of detaining people in contravention of the most basic of all of our supposedly protected civil rights AND the idea of torturing them was part of every (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

		Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
(...) Wrong again, John...that blaze of glory seems to have been more of a fizzle. It appears they were taken out with an overwhelming amount of force. Of course, it may have been strategically better to have taken them alive too. Excessive Force? (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
(...) Your certainty confounds me AGAIN! There was no trial. There is no evidence. Sure, there are allegations. All I do know is that two persons alleged to be Saddam's children and likewise alleged to be criminals against humanity were killed. I (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

26 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search