Debate : 21693


Off-Topic / Debate / 21693	21692 \| 21694

Subject:	Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:23:17 GMT
Viewed:	258 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:

Dude, to go out in a blaze of glory was their decision!

Wrong again, John...that blaze of glory seems to have been more of a fizzle. It appears they were taken out with an overwhelming amount of force. Of course, it may have been strategically better to have taken them alive too.

Excessive Force?

http://www.msnbc.com/m/pt/printthis.asp?storyID=943255

Excessive Force?

The U.S. military is celebrating the deaths of Saddam’s sons. But some are questioning whether Uday and Qusay could - and should - have been taken alive.

-- Hop-Frog

A thoroughly good read as well:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/03/07/25blame.html

Dave K

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
(...) (URL) Kooties, Todd's crazy FTX wants you to use your angle brackets, k? -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
(...) Wrong again, John...that blaze of glory seems to have been more of a fizzle. It appears they were taken out with an overwhelming amount of force. Of course, it may have been strategically better to have taken them alive too. Excessive Force? (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

26 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search