Subject:
|
Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:45:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
159 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Costello wrote:
| |
...and with evidence that these two were largely behind the guerrilla
attacks
| |
on the coalition in Iraq hopeful the region will begin to calm down a bit.
|
|
...or not:
U.S. Soldiers Killed After Saddam’s Sons Die
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=KV4KGBOSKFTHGCRBAEKSFEY?type=topNews&storyID=3139816
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Two American soldiers were killed in ambushes in Iraq
Wednesday, dashing any U.S. hopes that the killing of Saddam Hussein’s sons,
Uday and Qusay, would snuff out a guerrilla insurgency against occupying
forces.
-- Hop-Frog
|
And how many people seriously thoguht that the death of the kids was going to
help?
Not to sound pithy or anything much like that, but it’s only the idiots and
morons that don’t learn from history--violence begets violence.
And this is the best example to date--an ill-conceived war based on fallacy,
greed and sheer ineptness, and look what you have? “US prepares itself for
guerilla war” “US prepares itself for long occupation” Before the war it was
“no guerilla warfare and no long occupation”. More fallacies from this stupid
administration that are now hopelessly proven wrong.
Bungling, lieing, warmongering, greedy s.o.b.‘s.
Before the war I quoted, “Have fun storming the castle!”
Now it’s
“Nice mess you’ve created.”
Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
