To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19843
19842  |  19844
Subject: 
Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:11:43 GMT
Viewed: 
480 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:

"Our" side of this war might regard the conventions more than the other
side, thank goodness, but we'll break the rules if it suits our purposes.

Sooo, damning us if we do, and damning us if we don't.  Sounds about right.

You could equally say damning them if they do, damning them if they don't.
As others have said neither side is squeaky clean in this "War on Terrorism".

If you mean that I damn them if they breach Geneva Conventions, and I damn them
if they abide by Geneva Conventions, but fight to preserve an evil regime, then
yes you could say that.

As far as being squeaky clean, I don't agree that one must be perfect to
confront evil.  And I reject the moral equivalence of our actions to theirs.

JOHN

And I reject that you can sit there on your high horse and say "Those
b*stards!!" when you're doing the same thing.

I'm not saying that the US is *morally* equivalent to SH and his regime--I'm
quite thankful that, even though it was under false pretenses, that it's the
US leading this little war instead of, say, the Soviet Union.

That said, you expounding loudly that Iraq has broken Geneva conventions of
war and ain't that a bad thing!!!  when your side did same tells me that you
turn a blind eye to your side.

So again, take your head out of the sand, John.  "They" are not totally
"black" and you're not totally "White"--there *are* shades of gray.  Can we
still fight for justice even though we're not pure?  Of course we can.
Should they be accountable for their actions?  Absolutely.

But if there is *any* crime (against the Geneva convention or otherwise),
shouldn't those responsible be taken to account for perpetuating said crime?

Dave K



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
 
(...) By "same thing", do you mean that *we* are waving white flags at the Iraqi army and then ambushing them, or do you mean that we are displaying closeup images of dead Iraqis shot execution style through their forehead?" (...) Please cite (...) (21 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
 
(...) If you mean that I damn them if they breach Geneva Conventions, and I damn them if they abide by Geneva Conventions, but fight to preserve an evil regime, then yes you could say that. As far as being squeaky clean, I don't agree that one must (...) (21 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

42 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR