Subject:
|
Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:55:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
348 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> > >
> > > > This is war, boy -- there are no rules!
> > >
> > > Dolt.
> > >
> > > http://www.asociety.com/geneva1.html
> > >
> > > JOHN
> >
> > Dolt--tell me when we wouldn't bend/break or otherwise disregard conventions
> > where it suited our winning the war that much quicker--I direct you to the
> > post about the two terrorists interrogated to death.
> >
> > "Our" side of this war might regard the conventions more than the other
> > side, thank goodness, but we'll break the rules if it suits our purposes.
>
> Sooo, damning us if we do, and damning us if we don't. Sounds about right.
You could equally say damning them if they do, damning them if they don't.
As others have said neither side is squeaky clean in this "War on Terrorism".
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
|
| (...) If you mean that I damn them if they breach Geneva Conventions, and I damn them if they abide by Geneva Conventions, but fight to preserve an evil regime, then yes you could say that. As far as being squeaky clean, I don't agree that one must (...) (21 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
