Subject:
|
Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:51:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
730 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
I've lost my train of thought on this bit though.
> Unfortunately this debate which I feel is actually worthwhile to me is
> getting burried by some other debate. It seems like everytime you raise
> the "should land be property" issue, which would be new ground for
> debate, some other debate starts up and burries this one under the
> tiring Middle East or religion debates. This is what continually
> frustrates me about .debate and makes me want to just wash my hands of
> the whole thing.
>
> Frank
Absolutely - I've been trying to find some spare time to get in on this one
for exactly the same reason. I've tried to raise 'is land property' at
least twice...
This recent post touches on it
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=18846
In this old post ++Lar and I start to get somewhere but not to my
satisfaction and it fizzles.
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=13866
I am convinced that this issue is central to capitalism being at least as
'unideal' as communism and justifies my own fairly centrist socialism.
Having reviewed my posts to debate a riduculously high percentage just end
up with me raising a point no-one attempts to answer... and that's why *I*
tend to wash my hands of the whole thing fairly frequently!
Perhaps I am, having had the disbenefit of a progressive '80s education,
just a bad debater (?)
Psi
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) Yes, though a contract may be in place. I would tend to think that there is an implicit contract entered when the child is conceived. (...) Ok, point conceded. I've lost my train of thought on this bit though. Unfortunately this debate which I (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
47 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
