Debate : 19023


Off-Topic / Debate / 19023	19022 \| 19024

Subject:	Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:46:11 GMT
Viewed:	964 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes: > > > > > It is my assertion that if people have a right to exist, > > > > they must have a right to exist _somewhere_. > > > > > An excellent communistic ideal, but realistically flawed, sadly. > > > > Convince me. > > Yeah, that baffles me, too. Uh oh...I was trimming too liberally and misrepresented DaveE's stance. Immediately before his "communistic ideal" comment, I had written "I think I think that land should be a commons, tragedy or not." Totally, my bad! Chris

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
(...) Doh! Well, my cool ontological musings remain in effect regardless... Dave! (21 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
(...) Yeah, that baffles me, too. For any physical entity or object, it seems that "existence" doesn't simply imply "a place to exist," it expressly includes a place to exist. Not necessarily this plot of land or that particular country, but (...) (21 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

47 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search