To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18991
18990  |  18992
Subject: 
Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 23:40:32 GMT
Viewed: 
898 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:

One that I'm more likely to get
twisted up on is the existence of _any_ goods since they all come
from the land.

Is it possible to move to an uninhabited planet and start all over? This
planet has tangled property rights, but what about some other one?

My basic premise is that space in the universe can't be considered a limited
good in a system that assures that people (intelligences?) have an
innate right to exist.

Is it right to exist, or right to exist and be supported, or just right to
try to exist and to be free of constructive interference?

Also, why is space in the universe a limited good? The universe is infinite,
as far as we can tell, or practically so. What is actually limited is the
space in the universe that's easy to get to.

This means that we (in the USA) have either misunderstood the role of real
property by treating it as a good or we have been (accidentally) hypocritical
by claiming the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" as I
understand that phrase.

That phrase to me does not imply an unfettered right to exist. Rather it
implies the right to try to exist free of interference but with it the
responsibility to engage in productive activity to secure the resources to
do so.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
 
(...) Not a right to support (at least in any but the vaguest of senses) just a right to a place. In what I understand of libertopia, it would be theoretically possible for one person to buy up all the land and not allow anyone else to be there. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
 
(...) Hmm, interesting question. Some problems I see: - If the other planet has biological or sentient inhabitants, we would have to decide just what their rights are. Hopefully we would recognize them... - I would have a concern as to how (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
 
(...) Buried in that other people aren't contributing their thoughts because they're too wrapped up in the more emotionally satisfying debates about unsolvable situations in the Middle East? Or buried in that _you_ are too busy in the other thread? (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

47 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR