To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18487 (-40)
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) Now, now...lets not lock horns over the issue (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) If you have to ask... you can't afford it. :-) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) Bruce, thanks for saddling us with that foal image-- I don't like it one bit. Topping such behavior is my mane concern, not to stirrup more trouble-- I wouldn't want you to barn in hell. -John (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
 
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) I understand the pony but what's the Cool Whip for? Dave K -who wants to be 'in the know' as well (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) Whew! It doesn't say anything about a Shetland Pony and three tons of Cool Whip. I thought I was in trouble there for a moment. -->Bruce<-- ;-) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) Good choice, God. <snip> (...) That is a very bizarre way for an all-powerful being to go about getting across a message when it would be far simpler, and presumably far more effective for him to just give it to people directly without some (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) If one enjoys it? ;) I liked this [from OutSmart] (URL) I think the most absurd holding in the opinion is the majority’s conclusion that the Anti-Sodomy Statute does not distinguish persons by their sexual orientation. Indeed, the majority (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) Here's yet another piece of progressive action from our Texas-based administration: (URL) the important bit, in case the article's been moved to a members-only pay archive: Critics Say Government Deleted Web Site Material to Push Abstinence (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) And didn't I hear an interesting tid-bit on the radio this weekend, that judges in Taiwan (or somewhere) have ruled that oral sex is *not* considered sex at all--I believe this was in regard to 'committing adultery'. As it stands, if your (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) I read this as well, and I couldn't agree with Larry more--the gov't should stay out of the bedrooms(1) of consenting adults. Dave K (1) euphemism for 'lives' in this particular case (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) That's just plain medieval. I particularly like the fact that progressive Texas forbids "deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex." What, according to Texas law, would constitute non-deviant sexual intercourse with (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Also seen on CNN
 
(URL) hope the Supremes reverse their 1986 thinking... government has no business legislating behaviour between/among consenting adults. (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  An unfortunate typo
 
I almost shudder to mention this, since the underlying debate is serious and highly charged, but a CNN article about race and affirmative action included a really inopportune misprint, in grand Amos-n-Andy style: "At issue is whether race be used as (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Hey you Yanks! Catch up with the "World's Mistake"
 
(...) Even the 'uncivilized world' has went metric ;) The USA remains the only developed nation not to use the metric system. The costs of this are quite high as it means that any exported products have to be dual labelled. However, one should not (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) I agree-- it *can* give your life meaning to hope. But how about hoping in Santa Claus? Should we? Better yet, let's hope for some *NON* christian afterlife! If the ends justify the means (fulfillment of life justified by being Christian), (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) Which brings up the very discussion my friends and I have had for years at around wvery election-time--who do you vote for? Do you vote for the guy who is going to be good for your society, but not probaby good for you 'cause he'll tax you (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Hey you Yanks! Catch up with the "World's Mistake"
 
Too many failed Mars probes: it was the Mars Climate Orbiter that had the failed metric/english measurements. (URL) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) Sez Karl Rove: "As people do better [financially], they start voting like Republicans... ...unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing." (...) Dave! (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Hey you Yanks! Catch up with the "World's Mistake"
 
(...) You are describing the same problem, not a different one. (...) As I recall, they simply lost contact. Looking around so we don't have to depend on faulty memory....aha: (URL) ya go! -->Bruce<-- (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Hey you Yanks! Catch up with the "World's Mistake"
 
(...) I thought the Mars Observer had a different problem, as in the parts were built by different companies that didn't communicate clearly, and that the 'finished' product wasn't tested as a unit--the problem happened something like this-- the (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes: <snip> (...) John said many things in this very post that basically fit my idea as to what being a Christian is all about, and how I try to approach my Christian life. Nicely done, John! Dave K. As an (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Hey you Yanks! Catch up with the "World's Mistake"
 
(...) Someone please correct me if I have this wrong, but I vaguely remember something about Thomas Jefferson being largely responsible for rejecting the metric system in this country - he had his own pet way of determing what should be a meter that (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) <snip> (...) God has chosen to have His message spread by a bunch of incompetant, sinful, *human* followers. I'll certainly give you that. Christians do not see eye to eye on much, especially on topics such as evangelism. It really can be (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Hey you Yanks! Catch up with the "World's Mistake"
 
(URL) which the metric system, and the flaws therein, is quickly discussed via a book review. Going beyond the mistooks that the system is based on, it still is the way to go! Hurry up you Americans and catch up with the 'civilized world'! ;) Dave (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) Well, I had the spelling wrong, and the attribution. The name I was aiming for is Apollonius of Tyana. And here are a few others: Pythagoras (who could bilocate, by the way) Simon Ben Kochba Empedocles Shabbetai Tzevi Orpheus Simon Magus Sun (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) Agreed. (...) No, I'm not doing the Bible justice. We're agreed on that. The only way to truly do the Bible justice is to read the whole thing cover to cover. But anytime someone presets only *some* Bible stories, they have their own reasons (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) Socrates was, for example, a Son of God, though I understand that that's not quite what you meant. (Socrates was more moral than Jesus, however). Off the top of my head the other big one I can think of is Appollonius of Tyre, whose name I may (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) I'm not sure it was the divine manifestation to which the 'uniqueness' was referring, but (as I took it) Christianity itself. IE that it is Christianity that is unique, with a unique message. Not the Jesus-being-the-son-of-God bit. I could be (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) I would like to see your cites. Christianity offers a few unique twists. One which I believe is unique is the "fully human, fully divine" status of Jesus, and his fulfillment of OT biblical prophesy. I also am not aware of any God-incarnate (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) There are any number of self-contradictory assertions inherent in the Christian faith with which one could take issue, but this is the big one that needs to be exorcised whenever it's uttered. The whole God-incarnate-here-to-redeem-us theme is (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) I know the feeling about which you speak-- I was just trying to upwrap it and try and see *why* that is actually a comfort. For me, it boils down to a reassurance that we are not crazy, that we are not completely wacked on an issue, which (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) Here's the trick. I don't believe that the concept of objective morality makes any sense (that things or actions can be objectively good, bad, right, or wrong). Hence the difficulty in proving that something like slavery is objectively evil. I (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Brendan Powell Smith writes: <snip one of the better posts around here lately> Hey Rev, I think you're on to something with your reasoning that if it's ok to have missionaries in the pro christian direction it's just as (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) I don't feel it is is necessary to change everyone to my point of view, and in fact, it wouldn't particularly bother me if no one's religious views were ever changed by The Brick Testament. It would at best be a small comfort to know that (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) I don't deny that they seem silly *to you* and, as I mentioned before, that is fine, but I'm still wondering what the movitation is that makes you feel it necessary to change everyone to your POV-- to perhaps feel better about your own (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: IGNORANT view fuel the IRA?
 
(...) Does everyone in Isreal support the occupation of the West Bank? Does the majority even do so? (...) When Shamir ended his term as PM this is what he had to say: "It pains me greatly that in the coming four years I will not be able to expand (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
 
(...) I agree that Sinai is a large lump of land. However, it was [reluctantly] handed back to *Egypt* - not the *Palestinians*. (...) Barak's offer was empty (it had to be ratified in a referendum). He knew Arafat could not accept it. Even so, what (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Dealing with the problem
 
Larry, Take a look at the current fuss. Look at what started it. You should hang your head in shame rather that cause more fuss. It may be a cultural thing, but personally I think sniggering and name-calling is far more “anti-social” than my alleged (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Dealing with the problem
 
(...) Good analysis, Bruce, but it's not enough that just you ignore him, or that just I ignore him. For off-topic.debate to truly be enjoyable, it's necessary that EVERYONE ignore him, and manage to do so consistently. This is necessary because if (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Making a model of an real life car
 
(...) I work in a Nordic company, and my experience is that people from Norway have an advatage when speaking in Scandinavian forums: They can understand both Swedish and Danish. Danes, on the other hand, can usually not understand the other (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more | 40 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR