To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18477
18476  |  18478
Subject: 
Re: Also seen on CNN
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 14:31:04 GMT
Viewed: 
601 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/12/02/scotus.sodomy/index.html

Let's hope the Supremes reverse their 1986 thinking... government has no
business legislating behaviour between/among consenting adults.

That's just plain medieval.  I particularly like the fact that progressive
Texas forbids "deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the
same sex."

What, according to Texas law, would constitute non-deviant sexual
intercourse with another individual of the same sex?  And does the law
prohibit deviant sexual intercourse (whatever that means) with an individual
of the opposite sex?  For that matter, does it prohibit deviant sexual
intercourse with numerous others of the same sex?

  Here's another gem from the article:

Although only 13 states now criminalize consensual sodomy, a Texas state
appeals court found the law "advances a legitimate state interest, namely,
preserving public morals."

  "Only" 13 states criminalize it, which is 11 more than recognize same-sex
marriages.

     Dave!



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) And didn't I hear an interesting tid-bit on the radio this weekend, that judges in Taiwan (or somewhere) have ruled that oral sex is *not* considered sex at all--I believe this was in regard to 'committing adultery'. As it stands, if your (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Also seen on CNN
 
(...) If one enjoys it? ;) I liked this [from OutSmart] (URL) I think the most absurd holding in the opinion is the majority’s conclusion that the Anti-Sodomy Statute does not distinguish persons by their sexual orientation. Indeed, the majority (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Also seen on CNN
 
(URL) hope the Supremes reverse their 1986 thinking... government has no business legislating behaviour between/among consenting adults. (22 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

24 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR