Subject:
|
Re: Also seen on CNN
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 14:52:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
590 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/12/02/scotus.sodomy/index.html
> >
> > Let's hope the Supremes reverse their 1986 thinking... government has no
> > business legislating behaviour between/among consenting adults.
>
> That's just plain medieval. I particularly like the fact that progressive
> Texas forbids "deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the
> same sex."
>
> What, according to Texas law, would constitute non-deviant sexual
> intercourse with another individual of the same sex? And does the law
> prohibit deviant sexual intercourse (whatever that means) with an individual
> of the opposite sex? For that matter, does it prohibit deviant sexual
> intercourse with numerous others of the same sex?
>
> Here's another gem from the article:
>
> > Although only 13 states now criminalize consensual sodomy, a Texas state
> > appeals court found the law "advances a legitimate state interest, namely,
> > preserving public morals."
>
> "Only" 13 states criminalize it, which is 11 more than recognize same-sex
> marriages.
>
> Dave!
And didn't I hear an interesting tid-bit on the radio this weekend, that
judges in Taiwan (or somewhere) have ruled that oral sex is *not* considered
sex at all--I believe this was in regard to 'committing adultery'. As it
stands, if your spouse has oral sex with someone who isn't you, you cannot
sue for divorce on the grounds of adultery.
Though if your spouse is having oral sex with someone who isn't you and you
have an issue with that, there are probably bigger issues with your
marriage, and adultery is the least of your problems.
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Also seen on CNN
|
| (...) That's just plain medieval. I particularly like the fact that progressive Texas forbids "deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex." What, according to Texas law, would constitute non-deviant sexual intercourse with (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
