Subject:
|
Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 21:58:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1946 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
>
> > > It does seem that as education increases, so do the percentage of atheists.
> > > Is it this fact alone that is the cause if your seeming distrust of
> > > "education", or is there something more to it?
> >
> > It also seems that the higher one's education, the more liberal one becomes
> > politically as well.
>
> Sez Karl Rove:
> "As people do better [financially], they start voting like Republicans...
> ...unless they have too much education and vote Democratic,
> which proves there can be too much of a good thing."
> > from The New Yorker, 2/19/2001
>
> Dave!
Which brings up the very discussion my friends and I have had for years at
around wvery election-time--who do you vote for?
Do you vote for the guy who is going to be good for your society, but not
probaby good for you 'cause he'll tax you more?
Do you vote for the guy who wnats to cut taxes, thus keeping your money in
your pocket but that's not so good for social justice at all?
Do you vote for the guy who's good for you today, but not so good for future
needs, a la social security?
Do you vote for the guy who wants to better future needs at the expense of
todays wants?
We never get to a good concensus--for the most part, we vote for the guy who
sucks the least.
'A Little knowledge inclineth a man to athiesm, a lot of knowledge inclineth
a man to spirituality'
-unknown
There can never be too much of *some* good things.
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
205 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
